Job Titles

Department of Archaeology
Throughout my life, I have taken unexpected risks, seized opportunities, and benefitted from the generosity of others. I first arrived in the UK from Poland in the mid 1980s, accompanied by my best friend.
I started to learn English in my nursery followed by private lessons for me and my two cousins. When I once asked my grandmother why the family decided that it was good for us to do it, the answer was that one day we would realise it was useful. I went to primary school near my grandmother's home since my parents travelled a lot. I spent much of time there. The Primary School no. 30 was attended by the most financially privileged children whose fathers worked in the merchant navy, hence they had access to stipends in US dollars when they went onshore anywhere in the world. Those children had western clothing and access to exotic foods like bananas and oranges, delicacies we only usually saw at Christmas and Easter. What I remember the most are the framed cases of tropical butterflies hanging on the walls, the signifiers of wealth and prosperity that could only be obtained by traveling abroad. The other set of children's parents were working e.g., in the shipyards and on fishing trawlers, I belonged to this group. Thinking about this now, the teachers were most accommodating when my mother had consulted them about my inability to read. The teacher told her to start worrying only if I did not start reading by the time I was 13. I developed strategies to hide my shortcomings: after my grandmother had read any text to me twice, I could memorise anything up to a page in length, and so without actually reading a word, it appeared that I could read all the necessary passages faultlessly.
Gdynia, the town I grew up in is, along with Gdańsk, one of the places where the workers went on the streets in 1970: some of them never come back home alive. We were locked down at school and only allowed out with an adult. I was picked up by the father of my best friend from the yard where we were not allowed to play during martial law. I remember the convoy of tanks moving toward the shipyard and the eerie silence I experienced for the first time.
My secondary school III Liceum Ogólnokształcące was something completely different. It is still one of the best secondary schools in the country, where many of the pupils are taught in English, while others have six hours a week to work on perfecting their language skills. I was in the second category. The school caters for children of parents working for the foreign trade missions located in our port city, and children of people high up in the administration. However, to keep academic standards high, clever children also constituted a large part of the pupils’ cohort. My shortcomings rapidly become apparent: I was thrown out by one of the teachers who decided that my Polish spelling and grammar were disgraceful - fortunately, a place was found for me in a less ‘demanding’ class.
My language-learning troubles did not leave me when I entered Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. It was the time of Solidarity, and though for the two first years learning a foreign language was compulsory, I did not need to take Russian. Since the exams were based on verbal examinations I had no problem with one exception: my nightmare was Latin. I have to admit I struggled a lot with that.
During the five years of university study, since we could all more or less communicate in English, we all were thinking of going to England to see how the world looked on the other side of the Berlin Wall. But only my friend and I actually took up this challenge. Looking back on my own University days brings a sense of responsibility for the students for whom I am now Tutor. I remember the lecturers standing in the entrances to each student accommodation building trying to protect the students against the threat from the police. We went on strike and demonstrated against the government: we were all pro-Solidarity. The reality was brutal. Toruń is an old medieval city with most streets leading to the main square. One evening the streets were closed, the police moved in and starting beating and arresting us. We entered the University church considering it as a sanctuary, thinking that the police did not dare to enter it. Indeed they did not, but as a response to the ongoing worry about what might happen, and to prevent the unthinkable, we left the church. Our male colleagues were arrested and imprisoned. Martial law was proclaimed, the eerie silence returned: the same quietness I experienced again in Girton during the Covid lockdown. Memories started to flashback, and I found myself thinking about the most difficult part of those times, my mother’s disappearance. She was high up in Solidarity, responsible for all Polish natural resources, including from the forest, coal and water. She disappeared so as not to be arrested. We never talked about it. Fortunately for me, my university had no so-called big names. I recall not being particularly impressed by those who were – which encouraged me to see what the other archaeologists were doing and thinking in the West.
My chosen subject in Cambridge was the origins of agriculture in what were still, in those days, the Baltic Republic States of the Soviet Union. It was not an easy time to carry out field research in this region: perestroika started, the Baltic Republics became three independent Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), and the Soviet Union turned into the Russian Federation. It was a time of shortages and ethnic tensions, but most importantly for me, it was a time when I was able to build wonderful friendships that have lasted to this day. I also got to experience my first ‘White Nights’, those northern summer evenings when the sun never leaves the sky (curiously, I found myself longing for these while locked down at Girton during the pandemic).
My fieldwork in St Petersburg, studying pottery and other materials excavated from the Pskov region, gave me privileged access to the Hermitage: I was free to explore its galleries of classical sculpture and masterpieces of Western art, as well as the attic storerooms in the Little Hermitage, which had once been the quarters of the Tsar’s servants. Library research took place in the palace of the last Tsar’s grandfather, a few blocks away from the Hermitage itself. Why, you may ask, was I conducting research in St Petersburg (then Leningrad) when my real focus was the archaeology of the Baltic coast? Because all the books I needed, even if they were about Lithuania, were in Leningrad, rather than Vilnius or the other Baltic centres. I did, however, get to spend time in Lithuania, during which I was greatly impressed by the archaeology, in particular by some very spectacular sculptures carved from amber. At the same time, however, I was very aware of the history of colonialism in the Baltic and the uneasy history between Poles and Lithuanians. Poles consider the union with the Duchy of Lithuania in the late 14th and early 15th-century a good political decision, while Lithuanians consider it as disastrous, leading to the loss of independence. While one can understand both sides, I found myself subject to small tensions between the two ethnic groups. I also came to realise how deeply my education was influenced by the Soviet Union’s colonial influences on ethic minorities and satellite countries.
When I finished my PhD, my first job was as manager of the Pitt-Rivers Laboratory for Archaeological Science in the newly opened McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. I still work in the Department of Archaeology, though I left the Pitt-Rivers Lab some time ago and have since focused my research on the archaeology of art and heritage studies. It is a long time since I became a Fellow of Girton, where I found a home and a whole new dimension to my Cambridge existence, as a Postgraduate Tutor and Director of Studies. In 2019 I became the Deputy Director of the Cambridge Heritage Research Centre. My background as someone who has been subjected to colonial treatment by a neighbouring country has given me the impetus to initiate new projects on the need to decolonise not only the past but also the present.
My research in Russian Karelia stopped with the Russian Federation’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. I am now focusing on Japan working on prehistoric art and heritage.
Since the illegal invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation my research activities on the Rock Art of Northern Russia Project have ceased (if you would like to know more, please see the previous web entry Land the Sun Never Sets: The Rock Art of White Sea)
Heritage
Spirituality, Heritage of Practice and the Sense of Belonging
This project aims to assess the spiritual association between contemporary communities and the people of the past. In particular, we are looking at local communities in Japan and their ancestral association with the Jomon peoples, understood to be the first inhabitants of the Japanese archipelago (the Jomon period is dated to around 16,500 to 2500 years ago). This project uses the concept of heritage of practice to explore active linkages between the present and the past, in this case spiritual relationships with past communities, linking people between different times and spaces. This innovative approach allows us to look at both tangible and intangible aspects of heritage ‘rooted’ in the past, without labelling them as invented heritage or practice. This heritage of practice is linked to embodied experiences, the way in which practitioners might want to ‘feel’ as people in the past did (hence using the same building techniques, materials, etc.), or even developing perceived emotional connections to the past.
Collaborating institutions: Department of Sociology, Kobe University; Sainsbury Institute for the Study of the Japanese Arts and Cultures, Morioka University, Japan.
Decolonisation beyond the Atlantic slave trade
The re-establishment of independent nation states after the collapse of the Soviet Union has re-shaped central and eastern European as well as broader Eurasian geopolitics in the 21st century, a process that is still ongoing. The crafting of new national identities draws extensively upon conceptions of heritage, both tangible and intangible, that are a blend of pre-Soviet thinking informed by 19th-century nationalism and ideas forged in opposition to Soviet hegemony. Further, the attack of the Russian Federation on Ukraine in 2021, brought into focus the need to think more broadly in the way we can decolonise our museums, teaching, and approaches to so-called Western-biased colonial and post-colonial legacies.
Decolonising Museums: Voices from Europe and Asia
This initiative is linked with the collapse of the Soviet Bloc and the creation of new states in Europe and Asia. It goes beyond well-established initiatives related to Atlantic slavery and the implications of colonial domination by the so-called Western world. This initiative will start in October 2023 involving the University Cambridge Museums and MPhil (post-graduate course) in Heritage Studies students’ cohort will be involve in undertaking research into historic collectors, checking cultural groups and place names catalogued from pre-1989 borders to contemporary states by changing elements such as place names, cultural belonging or/and redefining the national identity of the donor or excavator.
Establishing Voices from Ukraine by the publication of one or two articles written by Ukrainian heritage practitioners in the Cambridge Heritage Research Centre Bulletin (online publication by Cambridge Heritage Research Centre, University of Cambridge). The publication is accessible without restrictions, requiring no subscription fee.
Translating the knowledge
Translating the knowledge is a project bringing new archaeological interpretations of the past to the present by engaging the general public and academics from the Department of Archaeology and beyond. To date I have taken part in and co-curated a number of exhibitions (including 2018-2019, White Sea Rock Art in Ulsan, South Korea; 2016 https://www.fnnews.com/news/201810261404344642, Garden of Fragments, Ryosokuin Temple, part of the Kenninji temple complex, Kyoto, Japan https://www.facebook.com/archaeologycambridge/photos/a.971982549543564/1128080233933794/?type=3&theater; 2016, Time and Space in Storytelling: Image and Text, Past and Present, Pomeranian Library, Szczecin, Poland; 2006 Lines of Enquiry: thinking through drawing, Kettle’s Yard, Cambridge, UK; 2003-2004, ROCK-ART image people land knowledge, Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Cambridge; 2003, The First Skiers in Norway, Ski-Museum in Morgedal, Norway; 1998-2001, Member of the Organising Committee for the Flaming Pottery: Art and Landscape in Jomon Japan exhibition at the Fitzwilliam Museum Cambridge, UK).
The forthcoming event is part of Being Human, Festival of Neolithic Ideas, Stonehenge, World Heritage Site, 9th-13th November 2023 https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/whats-on/stonehenge-festival-of-neolithic-ideas/. By combining our strengths, the Department of Archaeology, the University of Cambridge, and English Heritage present how contemporary science makes us know more about the past. Archaeological sciences and heritage showcase here the way math/statistics, organic and inorganic chemistry, physics, and biology are part of human stories and go beyond ‘boring’ static knowledge transfer. The global view on the Neolithic Ideas will be presented by Cambridge archaeologists showing how STEM subjects are integral part of learning about our present and the past.
Visual art and the past
Connecting the Landscape: Materiality of Substance
The aim of this project is to investigate connections in the landscape by the prehistoric people of Jomon Japan (approximately 16,500-2,500 years ago) through following the movement of clay objects including symbolic material culture (figurines/dogu) to cooking or storage vessels, and employing scientific analysis of the clays they were made from.
The tradition of clay use as a material is dated to c. 16,500 years ago, when first pottery vessels were created, marking the start of pottery use in a process of invention and innovation that spread from a number of independent locations across eastern Asia. This use of clay to produce vessels and sculpture persists to today as one of the most significant technological innovations, clearly originally attributed to gathering, fishing and hunting communities. This innovation required recognition of the properties of clay as a soft and tremendously flexible material when wet which converts to hard and rigid when dry. These affordances of clay as a substance were used by prehistoric communities to make objects not only durable but also easily to breakable: the objects created to be broken included dogu figures.
The methodology involves establishing where clays used in the manufacture of the figurines came from in the landscape, based on the use of a hand-held XRF machine which provides a detailed analysis of the chemical composition of the clays used to make these fascinating objects. This in turn can be used to identify where the clays came from, and is allowing the testing of ideas about the movement of commodities in Jomon Japan, essential to a broader understanding of the nature of Jomon society.
Collaborating institutions: Research Institute for the Dynamics of Civilization, Okayama University, Niigata Prefectural Museum of History, Umataka Jomon Museum, Sanjo City Museum, Morimachi Museum, Hokuto City Museum, Museum of Kyoto, Goshono Jomon Museum, Sainsbury Institute for the Study of the Japanese Arts and Cultures.
Facing emotions: visual art meets machine learning
Facial expressions are a very powerful medium for non-verbal communication. Transmitting, receiving, and recognising emotions and feelings through facial expressions are a crucial part of the neurophysiological capacities of being human.
The aim of this project is to engage with the emotional impact prehistoric art carries by establishing face-based emotions captured in depictions of faces that can be used in assessing the emotional potency of art. What are those emotions? How can we unlock the emotional messages they convey? The goal of this study, through addressing these questions, is to evaluate the potential of these methodologies for future research. The depiction of faces in ancient and contemporary art has the capacity to profoundly affect the viewer.
Collaborating institutions: Research Institute for the Dynamics of Civilization, Okayama University, Goshono Jomon Museum, Queen Mary University of London, Sainsbury Institute for the Study of the Japanese Arts and Cultures.
Publications - peer reviewed
2021 Prehistoric art as a part of the neurophysiological capacities of seeing. Examples from prehistoric rock art and portable art. World Archaeology, DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2020.1858952
2020 The Archaeology of Seeing. Science and interpretation, the past and the contemporary visual art. London & New York: Routledge
My specific research interests can be summarised as investigating the cultural categorisation of material culture and landscape: and the creation, use and meaning in the past and in the present.
Heritage, Landscape and the Visual Representation
In researching Heritage, Landscape and Visual Representation my main interests are related to the ways the past influences the present, and how the present influences how we interpret the past. In particular I research how in post-Soviet colonial era material cultures, visual vocabularies and symbolic landscape are used in the construction of identity and sense of belonging, as well as the way contemporary artists and societies use the visual vocabularies of archaeological communities and cultures.
Early Art of Eurasia
Over the last decade, my work has focused on nonverbal communication via material culture - including sculpture and rock art - and the materiality of substances from which these works were created. I have been working with the rock art of non-farmers in Eurasia: Karelia (Northern Europe) and Khakassia (Southern Siberia). I have studied sculptures of Palaeolithic human populations of the Russian European Plain and Jomon Japan and the way the material used to make them is related to the cultural categorisation of the landscape and the connections between the communities who inhabit it. I am currently working in Japan on establishing the clay sources to understand the way clay objects moved across the landscapes. My work in Russia focuses on the cultural categorisation of the world by prehistoric communities whose landscape underwent a number of climatic alterations, and what we can learn from this when responding to the Anthropocene.
Current Students:
Past Students:
Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London
Reviewer for international scientific bodies
International Evaluator for National Research and Development Agency for the for Specific Thematic Areas Research Team (Heritage), Ministerio De Ciencia, Tecnologia, Conocimiento e Innovación, Chile; Polish Academy of Science; Assessor for Preludium-20, Czech Academy of Sciences,;Referee for the Research Evaluation Exercise, European Research Council Remote Referee for the Horizon 2020 Framework Program; Advance Investigator, Assessor and evaluator for the Comité d'Evaluation Scientifique "Cultures, Patrimoines", Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France; Member of 8 World Archaeological Congress Scientific Committee, Kyoto, Japan; Member of the Steering Committee, International Forum on Human Origins: Behaviour, Environment and Technology
Reviewer for international journals
Antiquity, Art and Perception, Arts, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Current Swedish Archaeology, Ethnoarchaeology, Heritage, Journal of Archaeology, Norwegian Archaeological Review, Open Archaeology, PLOS ONE, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, Rock Art Research
Editorial Board member for the Japanese Journal of Archaeology
Postal Address:
Department of Archaeology
Downing Street
CB2 3DZ Cambridge
Information provided by:
© 2024 University of Cambridge