Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Department of Archaeology

 
Read more at: Palaeoanalytics

Palaeoanalytics

Human evolution is a central research area in biology and anthropology and has a history of research going back more than 150 years. For most of that time, evidence has come from digging up fossils and archaeological remains. Research in human evolution has been transformed by the impact of genomics and the development of ancient DNA methodologies, producing new insights into past demography, dispersal and admixture patterns, social behaviour, selection, disease history, and more.


Read more at: Shanidar Cave Project

Shanidar Cave Project

Shanidar cave viewed from the south (Photograph: Graeme Barker) 

The Shanidar Cave Project


Read more at: The role of traumatic mortality in late human evolution from an integrated non-invasive bioarchaeological and taphonomic perspective

The role of traumatic mortality in late human evolution from an integrated non-invasive bioarchaeological and taphonomic perspective

Traumatic death affects our daily life, but how did traumatic mortality affect human behaviour from an evolutionary perspective? TRAUMOBITA aims to understand how traumatic mortality among prehistoric humans shaped our behaviour during the Late Pleistocene to the Middle Holocene. Confirming that how we died had an enormous influence on our ancestors and represents an enormous change in how we understand human societies.


Read more at: Transitions in early stone tool technologies: a computer vision and machine learning approach

Transitions in early stone tool technologies: a computer vision and machine learning approach

The transition from Oldowan to Acheulean technologies are hypothesised to be concomitant with advances in cognition and behaviour. However, the nature of these shifts, and their cultural and evolutionary implications are poorly defined and understood. While extensive literature exists on these technologies, significant differences in research methods and traditions make comparative and comprehensive analyses problematic.