skip to primary navigationskip to content
 

Thinking about Things Discussion Group (TAT)

The lab sponsors the Thinking about Things Discussion group, led by our postgraduate community. Each term follows a particular theme and readings are set to facilitate discussion for each session. The Thinking about Things discussion group is open to the wider community interested in material culture theory. The TAT group meets every other Friday at 1pm in the Material Culture Laboratory. Bring your lunch and thoughts along! Current TAT organisers are Kevin Kay and David Kay

Lent Term 2017-2018

This term's goal is to explore the difference between 'age' and just 'time passing and things changing' by talking about old age. How is old age made salient, socially, and what is its articulation with the materiality of bodies, things, and places? We will discuss 'old age' as a socially constructed and contested concept about people, old age as something growing out of bodily processes (something biosocial); and the extent to which things and landscapes/places can be said to have age or to be old.

26 January 2018:  Old Persons

This week we will discuss how the passage of time is developed into something socially meaningful: age.  Two anthropological readings address the connection between aging bodies, value, social categories, power, ritual, and lived worlds.  

Turner, T.  2006.  "The Body Beyond the Body: Social, Material and Spiritual Dimensions of Bodiliness", in F.E. Marcia-Lees, ed., A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment.  Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 102-118.

Keith, J., et al. 1994. "Political economy and age", in J. Keith, et al., eds., The Aging Experience: Diversity and Commonality across Cultures. London: SAGE, pp. 198-259.

Readings can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vyfrdd253h5qa4n/AAAWgbCAOZnAFhI3SdC7AnfXa?dl=0 

 

9 February 2018: Old Bodies

This week we will discuss the materiality of aging bodies themselves in relation to social age.  What does a bio-social archaeology of human age look like -- what kinds of evidence and theoretical perspectives will best trace the enmeshed dynamics of time, physical bodies and social personhood?

Appleby, J.E.P.  2010. "Why we need an archaeology of old age, and a suggested approach." Norwegian Archaeology Review 43(2): 145-68.

Pearson, J., et al. 2015.  "Reconciling the body: signifying flesh, maturity, and age at Catalhoyuk", in I. Hodder & A. Marciniak, ads., Assembling Catalhoyuk. Leeds: European Association of Archaeologists, pp. 75-86.

Readings can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/uf36mxsn2w0n56n/AAB43qYPfPi3U0LF9ENPpu8fa?dl=0  

 

2 March 2018:  Old Places

This week we consider the extent to which places can have social age in some manner akin to human beings.  The meaningful and material salience that places' pasts could have in the past have been well-explored archaeologically.  We ask what (if anything) is common between the way human beings are aged, socially, and the way social spaces' salience changes as time passes: can a place really be 'old', or does it simply endure, change and end over time?

Readings can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/avhpk8pdv2xkfgv/AABd59V3Nhb_SkbcWCJcw9zsa?dl=0

 

9 March 2018:  Old Things

Continuing to expand on the concept of age, we ask how material-culture objects take on aspects of social age.  Does the changing value of material items over their social 'biographies' render objects person-like?  Given the potential overuse of 'biography' as a model for the way things change, given things' different materialities, to what extent or under what conditions might an artefact have reached 'old age', or something like it?

Miller, D. and Parrot, F. 2009. Loss and material culture in South London. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(3): 502-519.  (Touches on heirlooms and the preservation of particular objects for memorial reasons, but also instances where old objects are deliberately rejected and removed from people's lives)

Voss, B. 2012. Curation as research. A case study in orphaned and underreported archaeological collections.  Archaeological Dialogues 19(2): 145-169.  (A nice way to also discuss arch methodology and its role in curating/preserving/destroying certain types of material things)

Readings can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3qfroh4v16xmb2j/AABrs7sbUVSSMSYTqtzoF5TRa?dl=0 

 

MICHAELMAS TERM 2017-2018

13 October 2017

Introduction to the theme:  Emergence

Readings can be found here:  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hqef5ug8deli71h/AABbW8_bqTJSApZvSOeq1Wg4a?dl=0

 

27 October 2017

Seminar led by Dr. Parker VanValkenburgh on hybridity and colonisation

Readings can be found here:  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/v2qaolucn23cyr2/AACHoF_4G88EYRvAOTp7LGIla?dl=0

 

10 November 2017

Emergence and Ecology

Readings can be found here:  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ne69a0c5cdqi5mh/AACXq5WvMZsh7q5z7ta3yB6Za?dl=0

 

24 November 2017

Emergence and Assemblages

Readings can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o132yl4t9rayqi2/AADeVVKkKbzctQBqbTGt7g8Wa?dl=0