General Session
  TRAC 2006 SESSION


General Session I


Dr. Roman Roth (University of Cambridge)   res27@cam.ac.uk


The TRAC General Session offers an opportunity for both young and well-established researchers to present their work independent from any of the themed sessions. This session encourages the continuation of interest in the development of Roman archaeological studies, focussing on the role of theoretical issues within this subject and showcasing examples of current research.



Paper titles

Letizia Ceccarelli (University of Cambridge)
"Religion and society: The phenomenon of the anatomical votive offering in the Republican period"

Natalie White (University of Cambridge)
"Catering for the Cultural Identities of the deceased in Roman Britain"

Francesca Fulminante (University of Cambridge)
"Landscape of Power in Early Iron Age Latium Vetus: defining proto-urban developments in Middle Tyrrhenian Italy"

Dr. Patrick Monsieur (Universiteit Gent, Belgium)
"Amphora burials and/or burials with amphorae: on the use of amphorae in the northern necropolis of Potentia (Porto Recanati, Marche)."

Marleen Martens (Flemish Heritage Institute, Belgium)
"The tumulus of Tienen-Grijpen: funerary feasts and purification rituals"

Hannah Cordts von Löwis of Menar (Institute of Archaeology, UCL)
"Hermann the German: a national hero? Representations of Arminius in German history schoolbooks"



Abstracts

"Religion and society: The phenomenon of the anatomical votive offering in the Republican period"
Letizia Ceccarelli (University of Cambridge)

The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the connection between religion, ritual and society and their reflection on the landscape in the area of Latium, south of Rome, from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC. Society transforms and expresses individual experience through culture and ideology, which has its materialisation in physical realities such as rituals, symbols and public architecture, whose distribution across the landscape is a reflection of the socio-political organisation.

Roman religion is generally understood to have comprised of ritually induced experience and collectively perpetuated belief. The religious acts and observances then had a strong political component and were a statement of social status and cultural identity.

When considering rituals, it is fundamental to explore the literary sources. However, literary texts rarely offer an objective representation of rituals, as they themselves reflect an ideological structure that served the interest of the ruling elite. This generated a sharp separation between the elite religious beliefs and those of the mass of the illiterate population, and thus encouraged the growth of specialist, 'pragmatic' cults, especially healing cults, where participation was more an individual experience expressed by votive offerings.

This paper will explore the theoretical interpretation of Roman religion in order to identify the meaning of individual performances of ritual activities, that it was not merely the repetition of fixed rules but a conscious attempt to undertake a ritual. The phenomenon of mid-Republican votive deposits, in particular ex-voto terracottas, provide the opportunity to recognise individual experiences of religion in the participation of rituals not just as part of a community, but also in taking an active role in the ceremonies. It also offers the opportunity to analyse the modes and effects of the Roman expansion. The sudden increase in the number of votive terracotta deposits within Etruscan and Italic societies has been associated with the Roman expansion in Italy. It is suggested that a function of colonies was not only as a strategic place for garrisons in troublesome areas, but also as "religious staging posts of Roman expansion".


"Catering for the Cultural Identities of the deceased in Roman Britain"
Natalie White (University of Cambridge)

The recognition of cultural change being not only multidirectional, but unique according to geographical and chronological context has fuelled a number of recent identity studies within the realm of Roman archaeology. These have focused upon the discrepant experiences of Britons during the late pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman period. Parallel to this, has been the recognition that we are what we eat, and that foodstuffs in the past were not simply consumed for subsistence. This has generated a great deal of research on the cultural associations between food and people.

I propose to bring these two strands of thought together, and highlight the possible potential of examining the food remains within burials at this time of active cultural change. Both the Romans and indigenous Britons appear to have possessed similar funerary rituals involving food, particularly the inclusion of food offerings with the deceased in the grave. I intend to illustrate that if sufficient steps are taken to retrieve such data, that it may be possible to detect some of the social and cultural choices that were made.

In time, I hope that I may be able to ask a number of questions, although some will be introduced here. For example, does funerary cuisine change visibly over time, and can we see any regional patterns? Do late pre-Roman Iron Age tastes prevail? Are these remains reflective of the typical diet within the area, or were these foods perhaps being chosen for religious or monetary reasons? Does the age and sex of the deceased individual have any bearing of the food that they were buried with?


"Landscape of Power in Early Iron Age Latium Vetus:
defining proto-urban developments in Middle Tyrrhenian Italy"

Francesca Fulminante (University of Cambridge)

Urbanisation in Middle Tyrrhenian Italy has been a much-debated question in recent years: when did the city in central Italy begun? What is the relationship between the rise of the city in this region and colonisation by Greece?

This paper aims to answer these questions by applying a contextual approach based on the analysis of archaeological evidence from Latium Vetus, the region south of the Tiber, which is dominated by the city of Rome.

By comparing funerary evidence and spatial analyses (rank-size, X-Tent, weighted Voronoi and central place model), I aim to reconstruct the political landscape of Early Iron Latium Vetus. My analysis concludes that urbanisation in Middle Tyrrhenian Italy is an autochthonous process which must be seen within the perspective of the peer polity interaction model between various regions of the Mediterranean basin, rather than as a secondary phenomenon imported from Greece.


"Amphora burials and/or burials with amphorae :
on the use of amphorae in the northern necropolis of
Potentia (Porto Recanati, Marche)"
Patrick Monsieur (Universiteit Gent, Belgium)

From 1962 to 1965, L. Mercando excavated the necropolis on the north of the colony of Potentia, just near the coast. Recent excavations in the monumental centre of the ancient city by the Soprintenza and survey by the Ghent University, as well intra muros as in the nearby countryside, allow a confrontation of old and new results. Especially the circulation and use of amphorae is of high interest, since the region itself produced several types (a kiln was recently discovered), but also saw imports from different regions as North-Italy and the East. The necropolis dates mainly from the 1st and 2nd centuries A.D., but some tombs are from the late republican period, others late antique. Of the 385 excavated tombs, nearly 14% yielded 1, 2, even 3 amphorae, 70 in total of which at least 14 different types were recognized.

It is the aim to present different levels in the study of amphorae in funeral contexts: chronology, their occurrence or absence, presence and preference of different types and possibly their content or what they stand for, absence of specific types, residuality, relation to sex, age and social identity, the funeral rituals, eschatology. There is the nearly complete absence of amphorae in tombs during the Julio-Claudian period, whereas from the Flavians on they occur regularly. The functional interpretation is hampered by the waste of production sites and of consumption scattering around, as well as the use of amphora fragments for building purposes (civic and funeral), a fact that was clearly revealed by survey and recent excavations. Is there a preference in the ritual for Aegean and Forlimpopoli amphorae, or do they only count for libations of wine and Dionysiac rites? Why these funnel-mouth amphorae, most probably designed for the transport of olives? Were amphorae used as grave-markers? There is the specific use and deposition: as a coffin (double meaning?), put upside down sometimes in combination with another vessel (libation), as gift for the departed. Finally, can the northern necropolis of Potentia be considered as a current example of funeral practices with amphorae at different periods, or is it a mere example where local or regional burial customs were dominating?


"The tumulus of Tienen-Grijpen: funerary feasts and purification rituals"
Marleen Martens
(Flemish Heritage Institute, Belgium)
In the summer of 2002 archaeologists discovered the remains of an undisturbed tumulus burial. The grave was situated in the liminal zone at the far end of the settlement area next to a road for intra vicus circulation. The chamber was set in a shaft almost 4 metres deep. The chamber was 12 square metres with a timber-planked wall founded on posts. One of the postholes contained a statue of Dionysus/Bacchus. The floor of the burial chamber was covered with remains of the funeral pyre and some intact objects. On first inspection this would appear as a rather poor tumulus burial. However, the focus of this burial was on top of the roof of the chamber.

On the roof of the chamber, the body of a young woman was laid next to a horse, 4 dogs and dozens of dog foetuses. In between the woman and the animals a range of roof tiles, complete pots, objects in copper alloy and glass were laid out. The presence of objects on top of the funeral chamber has rarely been observed while excavating tumulus burials. Even more surprising is the position of the woman and the animals on top of the cover of the chamber, instead of in it. The fact that the woman was laid outside the burial itself and amongst the animals puts her in the centre of the funerary rituals with the sacrifices. Are we dealing with a human sacrifice?

Dogs and puppies have never been registered before in tumulus burials of the region. What could be the role of the dogs and especially of the dog foetuses? We know that dogs and especially puppies were customarily used for purification. We know that death together with childbirth are the most important transitional phases of life and therefore potentially heavily polluted. Dogs were used as scapegoats by means of which the impurity and pollution of both people and places were removed. From Plutarch we know that rubbing people with dead bodies of puppies was thought to cause all harmful and polluting substances to be absorbed by the animal, and thus remove them from the person. This role is not at all insignificant in a culture in which ceremonies of purification are almost a necessity of life. Are we dealing here with purification rites concerning a death in circumstances considered so polluted that it could bring calamity over the community?


"Hermann the German: a national hero? Representations of Arminius in German history schoolbooks"
Hannah Cordts von Löwis of Menar (Insitute of Archaeology, UCL)

History schoolbooks offer a wealth of information about the society that produced them. For example, they reflect the 'official' version of the past more than any other medium - the state carefully considers what picture of the past it wants its children to acquire. As such, schoolbook research offers interesting insights into the way history as a subject is used/contributes to the development and construction of national identities and notions of citizenship. History education also represents the sole (or the primary) source of historical knowledge for most people and thus must not be neglected by archaeologists who have an interest in making their discipline accessible and relevant to the general public. In this paper I will examine the changing nature of the representation of Arminius in German history schoolbooks through time - placing particular emphasis on the differences in the portrayal of Hermann between East and West German schoolbooks. This paper will therefore provide insights into the difficult and close relationship that the Germans have with their Roman past, highlighting the ways in which politics and political ideology colour the interpretation and knowledge of the past as well as the role that is ascribed to Arminius and the Varus battle (and history in general) in the construction of German national identities.



Return to sessions page here
Last updated 28th February 2006     R.M.B.